Skip to content
Decorative
OHOA Module: Progressing from Non-symbolic to Symbolic Communication and Complex Language

References


Bruce, S. M. (2005). The impact of congenital deafblindness on the struggle to symbolism. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 52(3), 233-251.

Buchanan, L. (August 2011, rev.). Operational definitions of best practice. Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind.

Crook, C., & Miles, B. (1999). Developing basic language forms. In B. Miles & M. Riggio (Eds.), Remarkable conversations: A guide to developing meaningful communication with children and young adults who are deafblind, p. 124-145. Watertown, MA: Perkins School for the Blind.

Crook, C., Miles, B., & Riggio, M. (1999a). Selection of communication modes. In B. Miles & M. Riggio (Eds.), Remarkable conversations: A guide to developing meaningful communication with children and young adults who are deafblind, p. 124-145. Watertown, MA: Perkins School for the Blind.

Crook, C., Miles, B., & Riggio, M. (1999b). Developing early communication and language. In B. Miles & M. Riggio (Eds.), Remarkable conversations: A guide to developing meaningful communication with children and young adults who are deafblind, p. 146-179. Watertown, MA: Perkins School for the Blind.

Miles, B., & McLetchie, B. (2008). Developing concepts with children who are deaf-blind. Monmouth, OR: Western Oregon University, Teaching Research Institute, National Consortium on Deaf-Blindness. Retrieved from http://nationaldb.org/library/page/1939

National Consortium on Deaf-Blindness. (2008). Practice perspectives: Path to Symbolism. Monmouth, OR: National Consortium on Deaf-Blindness. Retrieved from http://nationaldb.org/library/page/1924

Rowland, C. (2013). Handbook: Online communication matrix. Oregon Health and Science University. Retrieved from http://communicationmatrix.org